Mapeamento do Surgimento da Temática Corrupção na Área de Governança Corporativa: Uma Revisão Bibliométrica da Literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21434/IberoamericanJCG.v11i00.143Keywords:
Corrupção, Governança Corporativa, BibliometriaAbstract
Objective: Despite the evident theoretical importance of corporate governance as a mechanism for controlling corrupt practices, as far as we know there are no review articles that relate these themes. In this sense, the objective of this article is to map the emergence and evolution of corruption in the area of corporate governance and present the state of the art and trends in future studies on these topics.
Method: This article is a bibliometric review, it is a statistical analysis method that provides a quantitative understanding of the academic literature on a given scientific field. The bibliometric techniques used are cocotation analysis and bibliographic matching analysis. In other words, we sought to understand the theoretical roots and identify the frontiers of knowledge.
Results: In the co-citation analysis, 4 theoretical clusters (theoretical bases) were identified and in the pairing, 6 theoretical clusters (frontiers of knowledge) were identified. It is clear from the graphic mappings that current research (frontiers) has more congruence between the different themes, while the research that forms the theoretical bases is more idiosyncratic.
Originality/Relevance: As far as we know, this is one of the first articles to store knowledge about corruption in the area of corporate governance and cluster it into theoretical bases and boundaries.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: The pairing analysis identified the following main topics in vogue: Disclosure of sustainability reports; Institutional Theories; Political connections; Corporate Governance Control Mechanisms; National culture; Foreign investments; Organizational performance; Financial paper; Factors determining bribery; and role of national and international regulatory agencies.
References
Abhilash Abhilash, Sandeep S Shenoy & Dasharathraj K Shetty (2023) Overview of Corporate Governance Research in India: A Bibliometric Analysis, Cogent Business & Management, 10:1, DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2182361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2182361
Al Maeeni, F., Ellili, N. O. D., & Nobanee, H. (2022). Impact of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure of the UAE listed banks. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-11-2021-0424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-11-2021-0424
Almaqtari, F. A., Hashid, A., Farhan, N. H. S., Tabash I, M., & Al-andal, W. M. (2022). An empirical examination of the impact of country-level corporate governance on profitability of Indian banks. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 27(2), 1912–1932. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2250
Andvig, J. C., Fjeldstad, O. H., Amundsen, I., Sissener, T., & Søreide, T. (2000). Research on corruption: A policy oriented survey. Commissioned by NORAD, Final Report, December, Oslo.
Benckendorff, P., & Zehrer, A. (2013). A network analysis of tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 43, 121-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.04.005
Buchanan, B. G., Le, Q. V, & Rishi, M. (2012). Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: Some empirical evidence. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 21, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.10.001
Buhalis, D., & Leung, R. (2018). Smart hospitality—Interconnectivity and interoperability towards an ecosystem. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 71, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.11.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.11.011
Chalmers, D., Davies, G., & Monti, G. (2019). European union law. Cambridge university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108654173
Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping Software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Donadelli, M., Fasan, M., & Magnanelli, B. S. (2014). The agency problem, financial performance and corruption: Country, industry and firm level perspectives. European Management Review, 11(3-4), 259-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12038
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Pandey, N., & Mishra, A. (2021). Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 135, 758-773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.015
Estrin, S., & Prevezer, M. (2011). The role of informal institutions in corporate governance: Brazil, Russia, India, and China compared. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 28(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9229-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9229-1
García‐Meca, E., & Sánchez‐Ballesta, J. P. (2009). Corporate governance and earnings management: A meta‐analysis. Corporate governance: an international review, 17(5), 594-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00753.x
Graf Lambsdorff, J., & Frank, B. (2007). Corrupt reciprocity: An experiment (Vol. 51, No. 07). Passauer Diskussionspapiere-Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe.
Hanousek, J., Shamshur, A., & Tresl, J. (2019). Firm efficiency, foreign ownership and CEO gender in corrupt environments. Journal of Corporate Finance, 59, 344-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.06.008
Hossain, A. T., Kryzanowski, L., & Ma, X. B. (2020). US political corruption and loan pricing. Journal of Financial Research, 43(3), 459-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12217
Kalyvas, A. N., & Mamatzakis, E. (2014). Does business regulation matter for banks in the European Union? JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 32, 278–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2014.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2014.06.007
Magerakis, E., & Tzelepis, D. (2023). Corruption, cash holdings and firm performance: empirical evidence from an emerging market. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 24(3), 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-11-2021-0310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-11-2021-0310
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic management journal, 25(10), 981-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397
Rajab, B., & Handley-Schachler, M. (2009). Corporate risk disclosure by UK firms: trends and determinants. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 5(3), 224-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2009.026801
Sutherland, E. (2012). Corruption and Corporate Governance in India: Satyam, Spectrum & Sundaram. TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 36(8), 685–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.11.004
Tunger, D., & Eulerich, M. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of corporate governance research in German-speaking countries: applying bibliometrics to business research using a custom-made database. Scientometrics, 117, 2041-2059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2919-z
Vu, H. Van, Tran, T. Q., Nguyen, T. Van, & Lim, S. (2018). Corruption, Types of Corruption and Firm Financial Performance: New Evidence from a Transitional Economy. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 148(4), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3016-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3016-y
Wu, X. (2005). Corporate governance and corruption: A cross-country analysis. GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 18(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00271.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00271.x
Wu, X. (2009). Determinants of Bribery in Asian Firms: Evidence from the World Business Environment Survey. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 87(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9871-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9871-4
Zheng, C., & Kouwenberg, R. (2019). A bibliometric review of global research on corporate governance and board attributes. Sustainability, 11(12), 3428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123428
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.